Connect signals with explicit assurance purpose.

Evaluate integrations and technology relationships according to permissions, evidence provenance, operational value, failure handling, and customer control.

PROGRAM STATUSIntegration partnership criteria in design

We are defining the value, responsibilities, controls, and operating model before representing a generally available program.

A partnership must improve the customer outcome.

These benefits describe the program intent. Specific access, commercial terms, and commitments require a separate approved agreement.

01

Defined use case

Explain which assurance decision the integration supports instead of publishing a decorative logo.

02

Transparent access

Document authentication, permissions, data categories, cadence, retention, and revocation.

03

Reliable operation

Define freshness, failure, retry, monitoring, version, and support expectations.

04

Shared customer value

Measure reduced manual work, stronger evidence, faster decisions, or better remediation outcomes.

Clarity before enablement.

  • Provide accurate technical documentation and a supported integration surface.
  • Coordinate security review, change management, incident communication, and deprecation.
  • Use trademarks and customer claims only with written authorization.
  • Publish limitations and avoid implying certification or universal compatibility.
ENABLEMENT MODEL

01Use-case and architecture review

02Permission and data-flow documentation

03Joint validation criteria

04Future integration profile after production verification

PROGRAM BOUNDARY

No named technology partnership or connector availability is implied until agreements, security review, implementation testing, support ownership, and customer validation are complete.